Preface to "Surgical Management of Endometriosis"
Preface to "Surgical Management of Endometriosis"
by David B Redwine MD
If you are a gynecologist dealing with endometriosis, you know the trite drill dictated by conventional wisdom: in the office diagnose pelvic pain as
a sexually-transmitted pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) and treat with antibiotics; diagnose recurrent pelvic pain as recurrent PID in a woman with
loose morals and treat again with antibiotics; when the patient (sometimes
virginal) re-presents with pain thought to be due to yet another recurrent
STD, perform a laparoscopy and finally diagnose endometriosis; shine a
coherent beam of light at the disease or put a metal electrode on the
various spots and step on a foot pedal to unleash unseen electrons and
pronounce that the disease is treated; administer powerful and expensive
medical agents with multiple side effects and reassure the patient that this
combination of treatment will be the best treatment for her disease since
this is what most clinicians use; shuffle the suffering patient to various
other practitioners, including psychiatrists and pain clinics; question her
about childhood sexual abuse when her pain doesn't respond well; repeat a
laparoscopy; repeat the same therapies which didn¹t seem to work the first
time; repeat these a third time to be certain they didn't work the second
time; perform a total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral
salpingo-oophorectomy; rush off to perform a routine vaginal delivery when
the patient returns to the office complaining of pain and vasomotor
menopausal symptoms. Modern therapy of endometriosis has become
unimaginative, rigid and dogmatic.
It is universally acknowledged that endometriosis is a confusing,
enigmatic, mysterious disease, but this need not be so. Confusion is an
opportunity for change if this confusion is recognized for what it is: lack
of accurate information. Whereas the debate about the origin of the disease
rages confusingly, the debate on treatment has become quite distilled. The
word "treatment" is used here in the same manner as when one talks about
treatment of a urinary tract infection: the disease is gone when treatment
is concluded, and symptoms once caused by the disease are gone as well.
This use of the word "treatment" is familiar and comforting to patients and
physicians and can be used to summarize modern therapy of endometriosis
accurately in one sentence: Since no available medicine eradicates
endometriosis, surgery is its only treatment. It thus becomes a question
simply of which type of surgical treatment most effectively eradicates the
disease. This book will help the reader answer that question.
The introductory chapters written by me present my thoughts on various
topics related to the history and treatment of endometriosis which I think
are important. These chapters are based on a deep and broad familiarity of
the literature as well as a quarter-century of personal and professional
interest in the disease.
Most of the confusion regarding endometriosis stems from long-held
biases which are rooted in misinformation. This misinformation has entered
our understanding due to a predictable phenomenon which has a name: Berkson's fallacy. This fallacy has operated from the very beginning of our
understanding of the disease. Because it operated unidentified and
uncorrected, its deleterious effects on our understanding were magnified
over many decades and have become huge. This has led to enormous inertia
both in treatment and research because we have been unwilling to give up the
past, partly because of the fear that we have been so wrong for so long.
Things can be made right by leaving our minds open to new thoughts regarding
the disease, with the possibility that we must reject much of what we think
we know. Understanding clearly the origins of our current confusion will
make it easier to face a future which contains the real truth about the
disease.
Our profession must grapple with the probability that Sampson¹s theory
of origin is incorrect because the facts upon which it was based were
incorrect. Sampson did not have all the facts we have today when he devised
this theory. It seems unlikely that he would have supported reflux
menstruation as the origin of endometriosis if he was aware of the
information in Chapter 2. Continuing support for his theory of origin is
not just an intellectual question, because this theory directly affects the
treatment of most women today. If the theory is wrong, then it is probable
that most women are being poorly treated.
Misunderstanding about endometriosis is due to a predictable phenomenon
which has a name: Berkson¹s fallacy. This fallacy has operated from the very
beginning of our understanding of the disease and its effects are discussed
in Chapter 2. Because Berkson¹s fallacy has operated unidentified and
uncorrected for many decades, its deleterious effects on our understanding
have been magnified over time and have become huge. This has led to enormous
inertia in understanding, treatment and research because we have been
unwilling to give up the past, partly because of the fear that we have been
so wrong for so long. Things can be made right by leaving our minds open to
new thoughts regarding the disease, with the possibility that we must reject
much of what we think we know. Understanding clearly the origins of our
current confusion will make it easier to face a future which contains the
real truth about the disease.
The practice of medicine is sublimely simple because there are only
three choices available for almost any ailment: 1. Do nothing. 2. Treat with
medicine. 3. Treat with surgery. The patient with endometriosis will already
have tried doing nothing, and that did not work because she is now in your
office. This simplifies greatly the care of patients with endometriosis
because once the diagnosis is made surgically, there are only two treatment
options: medicine or surgery. (Observation of a treatable disease which has
led to surgery is not ration by anyone¹s judgment. If observation seems
ration. Then surgery should not have been done.) to decide between these two
modalities, more information is needed, and this book provides that
information. The history of development of medical therapy is outlined in
Chapter 2, and modern medical therapy and possibilities for the future are
discussed in Chapter 3. It should be apparent after reading these chapters
that endometriosis is a disease which requires surgery for diagnosis and
treatment, and this should be a part of the process of informed consent with
the patient.
The remainder of the book is its raison d'etre: how to treat virtually
any manifestation of endometriosis surgically using any one of a number of
surgical energy systems. Since surgery is a visual as well as a tactile and
judgmental art, an effort has been made to provide illustrations of surgical
strategies with the hope that if a surgeon sees what is supposed to happen,
it can be made to happen in that surgeon¹s hands. The chapters by experts in
surgical treatment of endometriosis will allow readers to compare surgical
energy systems and perhaps choose one that is most adaptable to their
surgical style. There is admittedly a heavy emphasis on excision, which
alone is able to treat both superficial and invasive endometriosis
completely anywhere in the body.
Many of the chapters and accompanying illustrations were produced by
myself. These images were selected to illustrate what I consider to be
important points gained through the surgical treatment of over 2,500
patients with endometriosis from around the world. Most of these patients
have had multiple surgeries and several rounds of medical therapy. One
common thread clearly stands out: their disease has never been completely
eradicated. They are dealing not with recurrent disease, but with persistent
disease. Everything possible has been done to them and to their disease
except one thing: the disease has never been removed from their bodies.
This book will help surgeons to eradicate endometriosis from any
location in the body. Endometriosis surgery is rightfully considered the
most difficult surgery to be done in gynecology, and some cases will seem to
be the most difficult surgery possible anywhere in the human body, maximally
taxing the mental and physical strength of the surgeon. For those surgeons
who relish challenge, endometriosis is the perfect disease.
Surgical Management of Endometriosis
(ISBN 1 84184 248 6)
Edited by David B Redwine
Published by Martin Dunitz, Taylor & Francis Group 2004, pages ix-xi
This preface has been published with permission by Martin
Dunitz, Taylor & Francis Group.
